In the realm of professional management , there are acts of wrongdoing that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that challenge the core of professional ethics . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of dubious professional actions that deeply harms the reputation of a lone supervisor but throws doubt over the firm’s standards .
Even in light of the disturbing claims , Collins has held onto his title , appearing untouched by the controversies enveloping him . How has this been enabled to go on ? What does this say about the firm’s focus on transparency ? Based on insider information , Collins’ history of unprofessional conduct was marked by infractions of the business principles, but it didn’t conclude at that point . Instead, it evolved into a chain of concerning actions that has left colleagues jaded and partners bewildered .
While attending a professional growth course —ironically aimed at enhancing leadership qualities —David Collins allegedly transformed what should have been a growth-oriented experience into a series of reckless events . Allegations indicate he spent organization-paid excursions seeking inappropriate relations, a flagrant contravention of Ventia’s shared values , all while his loved ones stayed unaware .
But the ethical breaches didn’t end with romantic pursuits . One of the bigger revelations involves his alleged misuse of company IT systems to transmit indecent visuals to women—a clear misuse of professional tools and a destruction of integrity. His bold misuse of Microsoft Teams to send suggestive messages —including emoticons signaling illicit encounters — reveals a character of a man unconcerned with the consequences . Following these digital overtures , Collins allegedly intensified his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in sexual interactions ventia kerikeri with an employee on multiple occasions during work time , despite his being married and her having a committed relationship . This flagrant misuse of company time and resources not only violated professional boundaries but destroyed families — producing a wake of personal ruin that extended past the office .
In what way can this behavior be tolerated to continue ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly breached every guideline is still in a position of power at Ventia? The response , it appears, lies in a concerning absence of supervision within the firm . Complaints have been made , yet Collins acts without consequences .
This deficiency of accountability conveys a risky precedent : that rank and influence within the firm can serve as a safeguard. It fosters a poisonous corporate Ventia New Zealand culture , discourages team members, and ultimately harms the company’s standing .